Skip to content Smaller textLarger text

Topic Page:

proportional representation

Electoral system in which share of party seats corresponds to their proportion of the total votes cast, and minority votes are not wasted (as opposed to a simple majority, or ‘first past the post’, system).

Forms of proportional representation include:

party list system (PLS) or additional member system (AMS). As recommended by the Hansard Society in 1976 for introduction in the UK, three-quarters of the members would be elected in single-member constituencies on the traditional majority-vote system, and the remaining seats be allocated according to the overall number of votes cast for each party (a variant of this, the additional member system, is used in Germany, where half the members are elected from lists by proportional representation, and half compete for single-member ‘first past the post’ constituencies). Proportional representation is used for the new Scottish Parliament and National Assembly for Wales, both first elected in 1999, and, also since 1999, for European Parliament elections in Britain. For the European Parliament elections, ‘closed’ regional party lists (in which voters cannot change the order of candidates on a party's list) are used and seats allocated in proportion to each party's regional vote. The system allowed the environmentalist Green Party and the anti-European Union UK Independence Party to win European Parliament seats for the first ever time, in June 1999. For the Scottish Parliament and Welsh National Assembly elections, more than half of the members are returned by first past the post from single-member constituencies, with the remainder being drawn, by means of ‘top-up’ proportional representation from regional party lists. This ‘additional member system’, which gives electors two votes, is similar to that used in German elections. It has also been used, since May 2000, for elections to the Greater London Assembly.

Continue reading

Helicon © RM, 2010. All rights reserved. Helicon Publishing is a division of RM.


APA | Chicago | Harvard | MLA

 
Journal articles, books, images, news and more.
Click to scroll to additional content.

IMAGES FROM CREDO

Sorry. No images are available for this topic.
  • RELATED TOPIC PAGES
  • RECENTLY VISITED

REFERENCES

  • Amy, Douglas J., Real Choices/New Voices: The Case for Proportional Representation Elections in the United States, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
  • Blais, Andre; Louis Massicotte, “Electoral Systems” in Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, edited by Lawrence LeDuc; Richard G. Niemi; Pippa Norris, Thousand Oaks, California and London: Sage, 1996.
  • Dummett, Michael, Principles of Electoral Reform, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
  • Farrell, David M., Comparing Electoral Systems, New York: Prentice Hall, 1997; Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998.
  • Grofman, Bernard; Arend Lijphart (editors), Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, New York: Agathon Press, 1986.

From Credo

  • Independent Commission on the Voting System, The Report of the Independent Commission on the Voting System, London: Stationery Office, 1998.
  • Lijphart, Arend; Bernard Grofman (editors), Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives, New York: Praeger, 1984.
  • Lijphart, Arend, Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
  • Norris, Pippa, “Choosing Electoral Systems: Proportional, Majoritarian, and Mixed Systems”, International Political Science Review, 18/3 (1997): 297-312.
  • Rae, Douglas W., The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, revised edition, New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1971.
  • Taagerpera, Rein; Matthew Soberg Shugart, Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems, New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1989.